Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-208665

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Over the years, the demand for esthetic dentistry has grown dramatically and there has been a rapid developmentof new adhesive restorative materials with nanotechnology that can restore the color and characteristics of natural tooth. Topolymerize these materials, light-curing dental materials extensively used are quartz-tungsten-halogen (QTH) and light-emittingdiode (LED)-curing units. Literature search revealed that depth of cure and flexural strength are the most important propertiesof composite resin materials, relevant to the clinical technique of incremental packing and curing.Purpose: The objectives of the present study were to evaluate and compare the depth of cure and flexural strength of ananohybrid composite resin.Materials and Methods: Two light-curing units were selected for this study: QTH (Bonart, Unicorn) and LED (Ivoclar Vivadent,Bluephase® N). The depth of cure was evaluated with scraping technique using digital caliper and flexural strength was evaluatedusing universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min.Results: Descriptive statistics was employed to measure the mean and standard deviation of the depth of cure and flexuralstrength. Unpaired “t”-test was used to compare the study variables. Statistical significance was fixed at ≤0.05 and LED-curingunit showed significantly greater depth of cure and flexural strength when compared to QTH curing unit.Conclusion: Curing effectiveness of resin composite is dependent on the light-curing unit.

2.
Archives of Orofacial Sciences ; : 85-90, 2014.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-628171

ABSTRACT

Light intensity output is one of the determinants for adequate curing of visible light-cured materials. The aim of this survey was to evaluate the light intensity outputs (LIOs) of light curing units (LCUs) in dental clinics of Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM) and School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM). The respective LIOs of all functioning Quartz Tungsten Halogen (QTH) and Light Emitting Diode (LED) LCUs were tested using two light radiometers. For cordless LED LCUs, the testing procedure was done in situ and after being fully charged. Statistical analysis using Kruskal Wallis and Wilcoxon signed ranks tests were performed to compare the LIOs between groups and between the LIOs of in situ and post-charged cordless LED LCUs, respectively. The level of significance was set at 0.05 (p<0.05). The results revealed that 72.72%, 42.47% and 92% of QTH, cabled LED and cordless LED LCUs exhibited acceptable LIOs, respectively. Data analysis using Kruskal Wallis test showed a statistically significant difference between groups (p<0.05). The intergroup comparisons using multiple Mann Whitney test with Bonferroni correction revealed a significant difference between the LIOs of cordless LED and both QTH and cabled LED (p<0.017). The difference between the LIOs of in situ and post charged cordless LED LCUs was also significant (p<0.05). In conclusion, both QTH and cordless LED LCUs performed better in term of LIOs than cabled LED LCUs. Periodic testing of LCUs is essential to ensure optimal performance.

3.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-174341

ABSTRACT

The placement of brackets precisely in clinical situations cured by light cured techniques is time consuming. This special technique describes an innovative idea of reducing the curing time and saving the clinical hours for placement of brackets.

4.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-139706

ABSTRACT

Background: Class II composite restorations are more frequently being placed with margins apical to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and margins within the dentin are prone to microleakage. Aims: This in vitro study was used to evaluate the influence of flowable composite and flowable compomer as gingival liner on microleakage in Class II composite restorations and compare a light-emitting diode (LED) unit with a quartz tungsten halogen (QTH) unit for light-activating composite resins. Materials and Methods: Mesioocclusal and distoocclusal Class II cavity preparations were made in 72 sound extracted premolars. The buccolingual width was 2.5 mm and the gingival margins of all the cavities were placed 1.0 mm apical to the CEJ. The boxes were prepared 1.5 mm deep axially, making 144 slot cavities. Teeth were randomly divided into the following two groups (n = 72): (I) Universal Filtek Supreme XT; Universal Filtek Supreme XT + Flwable Filtek XT and Universal Filtek Supreme XT + Dyract Flow and (II) Filtek Z250; Filtek Z250 + Flwable Filtek XT and Filtek Z250 + Dyract Flow. Flowable materials were injected into the gingival floor of the cavity to a thickness of 1.0 mm. Each increment was cured for 20 s. One-half of the subgroups in each group were cured with QTH and the other half with LED light curing units (LCUs). After 1 week of incubation at 37°C, the specimens were thermocycled (5-55°C, x1500), immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsine dye for 24 h and sectioned and microleakage was evaluated at the gingival margin by two examiners using a 0-3 score scale. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: The groups utilizing flowable liners had significantly less microleakage (P < 0.05). No significant difference was identified between Universal Filtek Supreme XT and Filtek Z250 composites with and without flowable materials. There was no significant between utilizing flowable composite or flowable compomer and between each similar subgroup when polymerized with either the LED or the QTH LCUs. Conclusions: A layer of flowable materials at the gingival floor of Class II composite restorations may be recommended to improve the marginal seal of a restoration.


Subject(s)
Coloring Agents/diagnosis , Compomers/chemistry , Compomers/radiation effects , Composite Resins/chemistry , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Dental Cavity Lining/methods , Dental Cavity Preparation/classification , Dental Leakage/classification , Dental Materials/chemistry , Dental Materials/radiation effects , Dental Restoration, Permanent/classification , Humans , Materials Testing , Rosaniline Dyes/diagnosis , Temperature , Time Factors , Tooth Cervix/pathology
5.
Braz. dent. j ; 18(2): 119-123, 2007. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-466503

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to evaluate, in vitro, the color stability of three composite resins of two different shades (A3 and C3) cured with either a quartz tungsten halogen (QTH) or a light emitting diode (LED) source. Forty specimens (20 x 2 mm) were prepared for each composite (Tetric Ceram®, Heliomolar® and Esthet-X®), being 20 for each shade. In each group, 10 specimens were light-cured using the QTH unit and 10 with the LED source. The shade of the materials was evaluated before and after submitting the specimens to artificial accelerated aging (4 h UV-B/4 h condensing vapor), using a reflection spectrophotometer. deltaE means were calculated and analyzed statistically by 2-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5 percent significance level. Both A3 and C3 shades of Esthet-X composite resin showed the lowest color change when cured with the QTH light, while Tetric C3 cured with the QTH light showed the highest color change.


O objetivo deste estudo foi verificar a estabilidade de cor de três compósitos polimerizados com dois tipos de unidades polimerizadoras, luz halógena ou diodo emissor de luz (LED). Quarenta amostras (20 mm de diâmetro por 2 mm de espessura) foram construídas com cada compósito (Tetric Ceram®, Heliomolar® and Esthet-X®), vinte na cor A3 e vinte na cor C3. Dentro de cada grupo, 10 amostras foram polimerizadas com luz halógena e as outras com LED. A cor dos materiais foi verificada antes e depois das amostras serem submetidas ao envelhecimento artificial acelerado (4h UV-B/4h de condensação de vapor), usando um espectrofotômetro de reflexão. As médias deltaE de foram calculadas e analisadas estatisticamente (ANOVA a dois critérios e teste de Tukey, 95 por cento). Os compósitos Esthet-X A3 e C3 demonstraram a menor alteração de cor quando polimerizados com luz halógena enquanto a resina. Tetric C3 apresentou a maior alteração de cor quando polimerizada por essa mesma fonte de luz.


Subject(s)
Humans , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods , Dental Materials/radiation effects , Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Acrylic Resins/radiation effects , Color , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Polishing , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/instrumentation , Dental Materials/chemistry , Materials Testing , Polymers/chemistry , Polymers/radiation effects , Polyurethanes/chemistry , Polyurethanes/radiation effects , Spectrophotometry , Surface Properties , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL